IIT Advanced Engine Control Lab (AECL) : Establishing Immersive Experimental Backstage Environment
At-a-Glance

What it is like to experiment inside the lab space of the Advanced Engine Control Lab (AECL)?  How Covid-19 has affected the lab community? What kind of experiences students from various backgrounds have inside the AECL lab? This project is started based on those curiosities. we tried to identify the connection between behavioral patterns of members at the AECL and the lab place as an experimental environment; Where the “backstage” is; in other words, where the formal becomes informal. Based on the observation, Interview, and description, my team analyzed and synthesized social and behavioral psychology and anthropology of a real-world scenario.

Client
Role
Project context
Prof. Carrie Hall
AECL's Undergraduate, Masters,
and Ph.d students
Field Observation
Ethnographic Interviews
Analysis & Synthesis
Experience Map
Storytelling
Team project (4 members)
7weeks
2021
CONTEXT
Research Insights that matters
PRECONCEPTION :
Before conducting research, we assumed that a lab required tight safety protocols and standard operating procedures because of the pandemic. Also, everyone working in the lab would have good knowledge of engines and hands-on experience with the experiments. Lastly, COVID-19 would have had a significant impact on the functioning of the lab.

However, AECL has an opposite environment, unlike our stereotyped expectations of the lab. Individuals differed in safety, work schedules, the engagement level of students, and even knowledge.
Shadowing / Space Mapping / 4 User Diaries / 6 User Interviews
1. Individual routines affect students’ engagement
Space can be utilized as much as the users understand it. Students show a big difference in their understanding and participation in the lab. In addition, the complex arrangement inside the lab reduces the usability of the space, which in turn acts as a factor that continuously weakens the accessibility of students with low involvement.  Therefore, participation in the space can be increased for students not related to the experiment by facilitating other uses such as meetings.
2. Uneven safety training level causes urgent lab emergency
Because of the range of backgrounds of the users of the lab, their level of safety training, and knowledge of safety procedures also varies greatly. While the PhD students are required to take an intense safety training course, other students are given an onboarding by the RAs, or learn from shadowing those already working in the lab.
3. Inconsistency in storage and unorganized equipment consequently delays the process
The lab is a revolving door. With a mix of PhD’s, Graduate and Undergraduate students using the space, the time any single person is associated with the lab ranges from one semester (undergrad) to a maximum of 4 years (PhD Student).
With Dr Hall being the only permanent fixture, it is important to develop a set of “Standard Operating Procedures” and ensure consistency in storage and organisation of equipment. This will reduce delays, reduce mistakes and accidents, and in the long run will ensure smoother transfer of knowledge from one batch to the next.
“ Messy Organized, Controlled Chaos, The mess in the lab is disturbing ”
“ I’m not OCD but disorder disturbs the way you work ”
4. Monotonized environment between labs prevents effective sharing
Finding the lab was difficult due to “ The infinite corridor syndrome .”
The RE building is a place conducting exciting and innovative research. But the basement space lacks any character, or identifying information.
“Downstairs (eng. building) everything looks the same, so to not get lost I take the same route every time. The Architecture of the Basement can feel isolating”
THE SOLUTIONS
1-1. Securing space accessibility for all
Changing the layout of the space could improve accessibility and reduce wasted space. The space also needs to be more flexible, adapting to different use cases and experiments. Using Additional elements like casters will be able to facilitate that.
Alternative Layout
2-1. Developing proactive measures and safety metrics
The safety training process needs to be reviewed and rethought. Developing a successful and efficient safety program in the lab and requiring mandated safety training requirements with updated and engaging content would ensure consistency in training. Also, creating a printed “quick guide” would allow for easy reference for students and a quick way to refresh their knowledge periodically. Safety cultures on lab could be more predictive, not reactive.
3-1. Combatting chaos with carefully arrayed and documented items (Imposing visual regularity)
Through neatness, it suggests an improvement to functionality, accessibility and efficiency. The idea of everything at-a-glance is appealing in lots of contexts.
So firstly, ensure everyone always cleans tools and puts them back in the right space.
Secondly, develop a culture of documentation. everyone spends time at the end of each session in the lab to document what they did and what needs to be done.
Lastly, a Kanban system, an inventory control system used in just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing to track production and order new shipments of parts and materials, could help track both tools and tasks.
4-1. Creating way-finding signage system
Start with having improved signage on the doors. This guided info includes a short description of the lab, students working there, and studying areas of research in the lab. The corridors could then be outfitted with improved way-finding and signage to guide visitors. Also, art and murals on the walls would add character to the spaces. Furthermore, a central site for all the labs to share data, updates, and information, or just a network, could also help.
IMPACTS & REFLECTIONS
Happier Research Students
Fueling the sense of comfort and belonging especially for students
Happier Experiment and Connections
The lab is a revolving door of people, with a mix of different levels of experience and backgrounds. Through the solutions, It helps students who can be more socially connected to friends, to community
Next Steps
We met with the participants once again after the research and presented our findings to them. This was a positive conversation as they are interested in taking ahead some of the recommendations. Over the next few months we would work with the AECL team to trial and implement some of the short term solutions.
Final Deliverables (Poster) →
Next,
My Design Process


Sharing the core stages of my process, the mindset I bring,
the tools I employ, and the frameworks I utilize at each stage.
Sunmin Ko
Chicago, IL, USA
ssmkdesign@gmail.com
© 2023 by Sunmin Ko Proudly created with Webflow.com